Where we're going

Research directions

The work we are doing now, and the order of what comes next.

Today

The work we are doing now

Our engineering work today is Servizo: infrastructure for the professional service economy. It is the first place our principles have to survive contact with a real system.

The decision that matters most in that system is where the power sits. A platform can sit between the worker and the customer and take a share of every transaction, or it can charge for the software and stay out of the relationship. Servizo takes no commission. Professionals pay a subscription for the tools and keep what they earn. Customers pay no platform fee today; if one becomes necessary to run the infrastructure, it will be introduced openly and for that reason.

That is what life-centric technology means in practice: infrastructure that puts capability in the hands of the people using it, rather than converting them into a revenue stream for whoever operates it.

Order

What comes next, and in what order

The directions below follow the order set out in our principles: mind, then body, then world.

That order is not a roadmap. It is a filter. Every research direction has to justify why it belongs before another, and the answer is always the same test: which one, if solved, makes the next one reachable? Knowledge makes health actionable. Health makes infrastructure worth building. The company grows downward before it grows outward.

The prioritisation model Three layers in priority order. First the mind: knowledge and reasoning. Second the body: health and nutrition. Third the world: energy and infrastructure. Each layer makes the next one reachable. First Mind Knowledge · Reasoning Second Body Health · Nutrition Third World Energy · Infrastructure The prioritisation model Three levels in order: mind, then body, then world — knowledge and reasoning, health and nutrition, energy and infrastructure. First Mind Knowledge · Reasoning Second Body Health · Nutrition Third World Energy · Infrastructure
A filter, not a roadmap. Each layer is what makes the next one reachable.

These are the directions we intend to work in as the company grows. We are not working in them today.

Criteria

Why these

We prioritize research according to its potential to improve human capability, health, freedom, resilience, and long-term sustainability. An area earns a place below by scoring on those, not by being interesting or currently fashionable.

Each is written as the problem first and the field second, because the problem is the part we are committing to.

First — mind

Intelligence

Knowledge and reasoning come first, so the systems that shape how people think are where we intend to begin.

  • Systems that extend human reasoning rather than replace itArtificial intelligence, toward AGI

    We want to understand intelligence well enough to build systems that extend human capability without replacing human judgment — the opposite of systems built to optimize engagement or manufacture dependency.

  • Computation for problems that are impractical todayQuantum computing, and the path toward ASI

    Problems in materials, chemistry, and cryptography may require fundamentally different computation. It is also one of the routes by which intelligence beyond the human level becomes conceivable. This is precisely where our one line applies: we would rather arrive late at something reversible than early at something that cannot be undone.

Second — body

Health and food

The conditions every other capability depends on. A person cannot use knowledge or infrastructure they are too unwell or too hungry to reach.

  • Health and food that reach people who cannot get them todayBiotechnology

    Understanding and working with biological systems responsibly. We are drawn to applications in health and agriculture that improve how people live, and away from anything whose failure mode cannot be undone.

Third — world

Energy, environment, and infrastructure

The physical layer underneath the first two. Energy that is distributed is energy that resists capture, and that property has to be designed for rather than hoped for.

  • Energy that is abundant, distributed, and hard to captureEnergy systems

    Abundant, decentralized generation. Concentrated energy systems decide who can be cut off and by whom; distributed ones remove that lever. Cheap energy quietly underwrites clean water, transport, and opportunity beneath everything else.

  • Repairing ecological systems, not only slowing their declineEnvironmental restoration

    Technology aimed at repairing ecological damage rather than only slowing it. Environmental restoration represents one of the clearest tests of our philosophy: if technology exists to improve life, it should also contribute to restoring the systems that sustain it.

  • Infrastructure that stays reliable and accountable at scaleLarge-scale engineering

    Infrastructure serving millions demands engineering that is reliable, equitable, and transparent — systems that work at that scale without compromising the principles that justified building them.